Friday, November 2, 2012

Learning Environment: is the learning environment at ASU good or bad?

Arizona State is one of the largest schools in the country and while that is a positive in many aspects, learning can be a negative. Arizona State’s learning systems are bad. A good learning system should be a place where class participation is encouraged, teachers have relationships with their students, issues are debated and open to discussion and students can develop relationships with each other.
It is important for a learning environment to have class participation. Class participation is important because it is vital for students to take part in the lesson. It is important for students to give evidence to their claims and thoughts (Jones, page 62). Many students are able to grasp the lesson and are able to write about the topic but struggle when discussing it. It is important for students to express their answers in speech rather than writing. In the real world, ones ability to speak and discuss issues becomes very important (Carleton, page 703). When students do not participate in classes, things as simple as attending seem less important. When participation is demanded, attending class is essential. A student who does not participate in the lesson will not listen to the teacher because he is not held responsible. When class participation is demanded, students must be ready to answer questions at any moment (Jones, page 59).
 
Another important factor in determining if a learning environment is good or bad is the student teacher relationship. The student teacher relationship is one of the most vital tools in learning. Developing relationships with the teacher is a must for learning and is equally important for the student and the teacher. Everyone learns differently, and it is the teachers responsibility to connect with his or her student. One on one mentoring is helpful in getting to know the student and learning how he can learn (Jacobson, page 55). If the teacher has a good relationship with the student, the student will want to send better work, wanting the praise of his teacher. There are many things that the teacher can gain from knowing a student. If the student enjoys sports, the teacher can relate a type of writing or situation in a story to a sports analogy (Jacobson, page 55). If the teacher is seen as a friend, the student will be comfortable in talking to the teacher if he or she has a problem with the class. If the student has had a poor academic experience, he is less likely to participate (Jacobson, page 52). It is the teachers responsibility to make the student feel comfortable. Teachers have many chances to make the student feel important, and the teacher can reach out to a student if he or she is absent (Jacobson, page 64). Students hate when teachers do not answer their questions (Jacobson, page 59). The student is less likely to voice his concerns if he does not know the teacher and thinks of himself as a name and not a face. Students want to see that the teacher is not “Just there for the paycheck” and want to see that teachers want the students to succeed (Jacobson, page 65). Things that are as easy as learning the names of his or her students is important (Jacobson, page 55). If the student does not have a relationship with the teacher, the student is less likely to hand in work that he or she is proud of.  

The third criteria for determining if a learning environment is good or bad is the ability to debate issues. Debating issues is an important tool in learning. When issues are understood, it strips the student of asking why or questioning it. All issues should be debated because in life, there are always two sides to every story. There is almost never one solution and even things in history can be debated (Carleton, page 703). Classes should talk about whether Christopher Columbus day should be celebrated or if the atomic bombs were ethical. College is a place in which values that have been ingrained into ones mind are questioned and changed. A common cliche about college is that if one enters as a Republican, he or she will be a Democrat by the time they graduate or vise versa. College classes should have discussions because learning about the other sides of issues can help in becoming a more rounded individual. Classes that debate issues make students prepare for class more than classes that do not. Students must prepare their evidence and discuss issues outside of the classroom.
    
      The final criteria in determining if a learning environment is good or bad is the ability for students to build friendships. Learning is very individual, but group work should be incorporated. The social aspect is important in class environments. School is not all about work and developing friendships is almost as important as grades. Everyone learns differently, and many students learn better in a group rather than by themselves (Brooke). Students who have positive feelings towards group work are more efficient in their work. Students become more tolerant when there is group work (Brooke). Students can work together to learn and can help quiz each other. In college, many students enter school knowing no one and have a tough time making friends. Students are more likely to do better in school if they have friends and a support system. If two students speak the same language, they can work together to understand things in their native tongue (Jacobson, page 60). Learning environments should encourage student relationships because it encourages discussion and debates. (Myers). Friends will argue about issues outside of class and can work together on projects. Learning how to deal with people that you like and dislike is very important in life. In the real world, people are forced to work with people that they dislike but must do so anyway. It is important for students to learn how to cope with people that they dislike so they can deal with it in the future. 

       Arizona State offers four types of learning. Large classes, otherwise known as lecture halls, small classes, online classes and hybrid classes which consist of part online, part in person. Arizona States learning systems are bad because the students do not know their teachers as well as they should, issues are not debated as much as they should, and it is too difficult to develop relationships in class. The learning systems fail in every category except for participation. The learning environment at a college is the most important aspect in succeeding at the higher educational level. Arizona States poor learning environment limits the students from learning to the best of their abilities. While college has many things to offer, learning should be at the top of the list. There are many distractions at college and a bad learning environment will make students care less about school and more about parties and events.
  


View Learning Environments in a larger map

UNI 110 Language and Literature Building 12 Small Class


Small Class: UNI 110 LL 12


      The small class environment is very different than large classes, online classes and hybrid classes. It is impossible to hide in a small class. The teacher knows who all the students are and the students know each others names. Small classes fit the criteria for everything and is a good learning environment. 

       Small classes fit the criteria because class participation is not only encouraged but demanded (Jones, page 59). The teacher requires students to discuss their position and will lose points if they do not. Activities that involve public speaking are also common in small classes. Activities that involve public speaking help students develop the ability to debate issues aloud. The student must be able to support their claims in a small class (Jones, page 62).
Small classes fit the criteria of students knowing their teacher. In small classes, the teacher is able learn about the student’s personality, attitudes and thought process (Jacobson, page 61). The teacher knows what the student enjoys and what type of learning he enjoys (Jacobson, page 55). Students hate when teachers cannot answer their questions (Jacobson, page 59). In small classes, the teacher can answer all of the students questions. In small classes, the teacher knows when a student is missing. The teacher can develop a relationship if he sends an email asking the student why he or she is absent (Jacobson, page 64). Many students that enter college are not prepared and are not motivated to learn because of past experiences (Jacobson, page 55). In small classes, the teacher can use different methods for students that learn differently (Jacobson, page 55). Students learn in different ways, whether visually, verbally or kinesthetically. Teachers in small classes are able to connect with the diverse student population. Colleges cannot afford to lose students who excel in things like art or possess unique skills (Jacobson, page 50). The student knows what to expect from the teacher and knows that the teacher will know if he misses work. In a small class, the students can see the professor on a more personal level rather than listening to the teacher speak for an hour. The student is able to see that the teacher wants the student to succeed (Jacobson, page 65). The student can ask questions to the teacher that can be serious or something about his college experience. In a large lecture hall, a question about the professor’s college life would seem out of place. 
Small classes fit the criteria of issues being debated. Small classes debate important issues in society and help students become critical thinkers (Carleton, page 703). In a small class, the lesson is not as concrete as a large lecture hall and can change depending on how the students are handling the material since there is a small number. The teacher can answer the students questions while also bringing up debates (Carleton, page 703). The students can talk about debates and all of the students can make their voice heard. 
Small classes also fit the criteria of students developing relationships because the group is small. The students will usually participate in group activities that will let them discuss and debate issues. Students are likely to build friendships because of all of the discussion based activities that help students get to know each other. Small classes enable group work because students understand one another better than a teacher would (Jacobson, page 60). Group work is informal and foreign students can speak their native tongue if they do not understand something.

[John Kluepfel]
[John Kluepfel]


Online Class



Online classes are strictly online and never meet in person. The online course fails the criteria because it fulfills two of the four criteria.

Online classes fit the criteria for participating because of the discussion board. The students post about the topic of the week and must respond to another students and respond to their response. Participation is required and points will be taken off if a response is not given (Jones, page 59). The online class feature small groups but the groups do not work together as they are to serve as to who is supposed to respond to who. Students do not develop relationships because they do not see each other in person. 

Online classes do not fit the criteria for teacher student relationships. The teacher will never see the student and does not have office hours. The student cannot see if the teacher wants his or her student’s to succeed (Jacobson, page 65). The only way that the student can get in contact with the teacher is through email. If the student has an issue, there is no way the student can see the teacher. This hurts the learning environment because the teacher and student cannot connect. The student will not know if the teacher wants him or her to succeed (Jacobson, page 65). The student is just a name and will never have a personal relationship with his or her teacher. In online classes, the teacher cannot teach the student in a way that the student understands (Jacobson, page 55). It is difficult to ask for things like recommendations when the student has never seen the teacher. 

The online classes fit the criteria for debating and discussions. The discussion board lets students talk about issues and debate them (Carleton, page 703). The personal debate of talking about issues is missing as arguments are formulated and the in-person feel is not there. The discussion board still lets students discuss issues and talk about the topic of the week. 

Online classes do not fit the criteria of making friends. Students do not develop relationships because the debates are not personal (Myers). The students do not meet and the small groups are not worth much if the students do not see each other. The class is usually by the book and students must do work on their on. Students do work at their own pace which takes away from the chance of group work if students are on different lessons. 



                                                                                   [John Kluepfel]

Hybrid class Engineering Research Center





In Hybrid classes, part of the class is online and the other part is in person. The hybrid class fits the criteria for everything while the teacher student relationship and student relationships are hurt by the part online course. 
Hybrid classes fit the criteria for class participation. Class participation is encouraged in a hybrid class because the class is not extremely large. The student body is small enough where the teacher can demand the students to participate (Jones, page 59). The in person part of the class is where the participation is needed. Hybrid classes include small group work in which students can talk about issues. Hybrid classes also let students respond to each others work online which helps in participating. The small groups give the students a voice because the teacher can ask the students to discuss an issue (Carleton, page 703). The teacher would not be able to do this by himself because he would not be able to get an answer from every student.

Hybrid classes fit the criteria of students and the teachers building a relationship because the in-person part of the class gives off for questions. Classes are small enough that the teacher can answer all of the students questions. The student sees that the teacher is not “there for the paycheck” and want the students to learn (Jacobson, page 65). Students are more than a face in hybrid classes and develop a relationship with the teacher. Hybrid classes are small enough that the teacher is able to see if the student missed class and could send an email asking why the student missed (Jacobson, page 64). The teacher can discover how the student learns and can teach content in a way that the student understands (Jacobson, page 55). Online, students are paired into groups to peer review work. The student can also ask questions via email but the email is more personal than in the online classes because the student and teacher already have developed a relationship in person. 

The issues and debates fit the criteria because of the small groups. These small groups help in developing public speaking because the students argue about issues (Carleton, page 703). The group work adds in the small class component with the large class. Group work is dangerous because students can become lazy and let one or two students handle to load. In hybrid classes, the student must be able to work in a group but also work by himself individually. The online work of the class hurts the relationship with the teacher. The student builds a relationship with the teacher by going from a name to a face. The student cannot go to a face if he can only see the teacher once a week. 

  The in-person work fits the criteria of building friendships because students can participate in group work and projects together. Talking about issues and discussing things help build friendship (Myers). The online course hurts with making friends because online work is very individual which takes away from working with a group and friends. 


[John Kluepfel]

                                                                                        [John Kluepfel]

Gallery of Design North



Large lecture classes have often been connected to Freshman classes. Large lecture halls do not fit the criteria for a good learning environment and fails in everything except for making friends.

Large classes do not fit the criteria for a good learning environment because the students do not have a relationship with the teacher. One might say that office hours are the answer to getting to know the teacher, but the office hours of the teacher coincide with class hours. Large lecture halls do not take attendance and the teacher will never send an email asking why a student did not show up to class (Jacobson, page 64). In large classes, the teacher will not be able to teach the student in way that he uniquely understands (Jacobson, page 55). Students might think that the teacher is teaching “just for the paycheck” because the teacher’s assistance is doing much of the grading. In a large class, the teacher must teach for sometimes hundreds of students and cannot take the time to get to know the students like he or she could in a smaller environment (Jacobson, page 55). 

Large lecture halls are not good learning environments because issues are not usually debated (Carleton, page 703). In large lecture halls, the professor has his or her lesson and follows it for the length of the class. Issues are not debated and things are considered understood in a large lecture hall (Carleton, page 703). The students cannot debate issues and their critical thinking ability is hurt. The lesson does not have much flexibility because there are so many students that must be accounted for. Students may ask questions but the lesson is on a schedule and must move quickly to accommodate for the other students. The teacher cannot answer all of the students questions (Jacobson, page 59). A lesson cannot be up for discussion because it would take longer than the entire class to hear all of the student’s opinions on the issue. 
 
It is difficult to participate in large lecture halls (Jones, page 59) Large lecture halls do not usually feature hands on work like a presentation or speech oriented task and usually have a long writing assignment. It is difficult in writing these essays because students are usually left alone in writing it. Essays are also intended for the Teacher’s Assistance, writing to a stranger is harder than writing to a teacher. It is difficult in getting responses to essays and explanation to their work from a Teacher’s Assistance because being graded in writing is not always clear. It is much easier if the teacher or TA is talking to the student and explains in person. It is easier to take the advice in person than on paper.
 
The large lecture halls do a good job at letting kids make friends. Students usually sit at the same place for lecture halls and develop friendships. Students at lecture halls usually make study groups because they can compare notes and share notes if someone misses the class. 



                                                                                 [John Kluepfel]
                                                                                [John Kluepfel]
                                                                                [John Kluepfel]

Works Cited





                                                               Works Cited

Jacobson, Linda Olson. "Editor's Choice: Valuing Diversity--Student-Teacher Relationships That Enhance Achievement." Community College Review 28.1 (2000): 49. Academic Search Premier. Web. 21 Oct. 2012.

Jones, Raymond C. "The "Why" Of Class Participation: A Question Worth Asking." College Teaching 56.1 (2008): 59-63. Academic Search Premier. Web. 21 Oct. 2012.

Carleton, William. "Let Us Keep Debating In Our Schools." Vital Speeches Of The Day 15.22 (1949): 703. Academic Search Premier. Web. 21 Oct. 2012.

Brooke A. Zackery, et al. "Taking A Trait Approach To Understanding College Students' Perceptions Of Group Work." College Student Journal 43.3 (2009): 822-831. Academic Search Premier. Web. 21 Oct. 2012.